Digital Fashion - Zend_Db_Table and tables relationships - Comments

Zend_Db_Table and tables relationships - Geoffrey

Geoffrey — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:10:42 +0100

Hi Sebas, my repository has moved to assembla (http://www.assembla.com/), I've updated the link to reflect this change. Thanks for your report.

Zend_Db_Table and tables relationships - Sebas

Sebas — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:11:23 +0100

You SVN repository is down it's imposible to download the source ...
Could you put a ZIP archive on your website

Zend_Db_Table and tables relationships - Geoffrey

Geoffrey — Sat, 08 Sep 2007 17:46:34 +0200

thanks for the patch, I'll apply it soon :)

Zend_Db_Table and tables relationships - Erik

Erik — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:32:22 +0200

Thanks for the code, it has come in useful. Here is modified version with a addition of fetchRow that handles the relationships. (the actual mapping was moved from fetchAll to a class member)

http://code.ryvondesigns.com/riskle...
http://code.ryvondesigns.com/riskle...

Zend_Db_Table and tables relationships - Mickaël Desfrênes

Mickaël Desfrênes — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:24:34 +0200

Ah! The Zend_Json... ;-)

As more and more people are using it, I'm sure the Zend Framework will come up with a specific and complete ORM solution. I just wish it won't rely on xml description files like propel, which I agree is a pain.

Zend_Db_Table and tables relationships - Geoffrey

Geoffrey — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:43:45 +0200

while propel is certainly a good way to handle ORM, it is not (yet ?) the way to do things in ZF (for some reasons, like "no third-party dependency" or somtehing like that I guess). Thus I'm sticking with the ZF way, which is not necessarily very clear on why we do things, as you point out on your blog with Zend_Json.

Plus I don't like propel (for having used it in symofny) :)

Zend_Db_Table and tables relationships - Mickaël Desfrênes

Mickaël Desfrênes — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:53:38 +0200

how about using propel for such needs ?